Pick the Gridlock in Washington

Sarah Palin: The Dark Side of Cute

In a recent opinion piece from the Orlando Sentinal, “With Palin, it’s all about the messenger, not the message” writer Kathleen Parker explores the “genius” of Sarah Palin’s “…jaw-juttingly patriotic and estrogen rich, not to mention cute as a button…” approach. Lo and behold, a phrase I thought of long ago has finally come to pass. Sarah Palin personifies “The dark side of cute!”

A fool's paradise?

Smart Enough to Vote?

Are you smart enough to vote?
Be advised, some of the dumbest people are.

Adopt-a-Pull Out Program

A piece by Alexandra Lange in today's New York Times reminded me of an idea I had back in August 2003;

Adopt-A-Pullout program is a shorter and less expensive way to be a part of the Adopt-A-Highway program. If you can’t afford to "adopt" a long stretch of highway, or freeway, perhaps you could support the maintenance of a pull out or passing lane, or even a cul-de-sac?

The Oscar for Extras

Written: {3/10/10}

Since the Academy Awards has expanded it’s award categories over the years - in 2010 there were (10) films, up from (5), nominated for best picture, and they are considering a future award for best Movie Titles Sequence, why not an Oscar for Extras?

It would obviously have to be a separate event from the main red carpet event in Hollywood. There could be thousands in wings and in the audience! They would show clips of extras scenes from the nominated films – Pure extras! No stars! No Story!

This idea came to me back in 2005 after having seen Shaun of the Dead. The extras in that film were remarkable and would have won hands down as far as I’m concerned.

The film Gandhi had 300,000 extras. What a bill to pay if it had won!

Question: What does a single Oscar statue cost to produce?

Things to consider: The engraving of the winning picture on 10,000 awards would take months.

It would take hours for the winners (10,000 soldiers, perhaps in make up and costume?) to accept the statues.

We'll B.C. -ing You

I’ve really enjoyed watching the Winter Olympics on TV. So I’ve written a parody for the occasion. I have a lot of Canadian friends, and in fact, my wife is Canadian, so this one is just for them, and especially for her!

It shaped up as a sort of, ersatz invitation promo ad for the world to enjoy this event in their “super, natural” country.

I love the challenge of rhyming unusual names and places and this one was a double corker with double entendre twists! It’s been a pressure!

I suppose it’s a sound track for a video of the things mentioned. I would ever get the chance to participate in creating something for real for the Winter Olympics, so this is a fantasy about being part of them on TV.

The tune my parody is based on is: “I’ll Be Seeing You” (Irving Kahal/Sammy Fain).

Here’s both set’s of lyrics – the original – with my parody lyrics in red.

I'll be seeing you / We’ll B.C.-ing you
In all the old familiar places / In all our cold come-hither places
That this heart of mine embraces / as the Maple Leaf embraces
All day through. / Olympiad

In that small cafe; / The stadium at B.C. Place
The park across the way; / That Richmond Oval Skating space
The children's carousel; / PAC Coliseum
The chestnut trees; / The Cypress Slopes
The wishin' well. / Where you’ll ski ‘em

I'll be seeing you / We’ll be showing you
In every lovely summer's day; / Runs at the Whistler Sliding Center
In every thing that's light and gay. / Where the “Born to Luge” spend winter
I'll always think of you that way. / With the new hot-shot contenders

I'll find you / Even Tho
In the morning sun / We’ve had no snow
And when the night is new. / And had to what with do
I'll be looking at the moon, / If you catch us on the tube
But I'll be seeing you. / Then we’ll B.C.-ing you!

The Olympics will be over soon, so there’s not time or reason to tweak it.

I wrote it all in one day, but Hey! It was a great one; I was part of the Olympics, in spirit at least.

Mason Williams 19 February 2010

PS sorry, no demo but here’s a lead sheet. I had to change the melodic rythms a lot to accommodate the words.

Doomed To Repeat It

Doomed To Repeat It
OR
Doomed To Repeat It?
A television series concept
Perhaps for the History Channel
By Mason Williams
Written: 7/25/00
Revised: 3/7/09

“Doomed to Repeat It” wanted to be a show on TV, a documentary style program that took a look at current social or political problems. Then, using similar situations from the past, presented historically equivalent solutions, illustrating how these analogous problems were handled in history, showing the causes, the manifestation of the problem, and the aftermath/fallout, good or bad.

Assessing the wisdom and efficacy of the decisions and strategies undertaken

that either solved the problem or exacerbated it.

The idea’s philosophy was rooted in the wisdom of the old saying that goes:
“Those who can not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it.”
-George Santayana

This idea wanted to bring history into the present.

“Doomed to Repeat It” is a provocative title that asks / proposes to answer the big question which is “doomed to repeat what?”

It wanted to put the lessons of history in the more relevant context of today’s issues.

These shows would, in essence, delve into the past pertinent lessons of history.

This idea had big plans.

The show could have been a great gig for historians.
It dreamed of someday being a show that the people would look to

not only for its entertainment value, but as something useful as well.

Who knows, maybe America’s leaders & policy makers of today

would watch the show and make more informed decisions re: current issues?

Excerpts from…
“Woe from WTO: Environmental and labor groups say the trade body will bring grief to U.S.”
by Kevin Phillips (a political historian and author)
The Los Angeles Times / reprinted in The Register Guard (11/28/99)

“The World Trade Organization, though officially only 4 years old, represents a huge intrusion on U.S. politics and on national, state and local decision-making, largely in the interest of multinational corporations and trade lobbies.”

“The historical evidence from the two previous great economic world powers is that whatever financial elites want—high profit global priorities—is bad for ordinary citizens, who are more vulnerable and require that domestic economics come first.”

“History’s example, however, raises major cautions. Indeed, the two great world economic powers before the United States—the Dutch in the 17th and early 18th centuries, and the British thereafter—followed the same internationalization trajectory as their world leadership peaked and then went into decline.
This precedent is as frightening as it is clear. As the Dutch and British global economies peaked, their future, said the elites, lay in embracing international rather than internal economic opportunities. As the old industries started to fade—textiles, shipbuilding and fisheries in the Netherlands; coal, textiles and steel in Britain—the elites said: Never mind. We now lead the world in services: banking, finance, overseas investments, shipping, insurance, communications. And that’s where the payoff is.

Within each nation—the 1720-40 Holland and Britain in the “Upstairs, Downstairs” era of 1900-1914—two things came to pass. First, common people started losing the old industrial jobs that had made ordinary Dutchmen and Britons the envy of Europe. The old industrial districts deteriorated. Second, even as industrial decay worsened, finance and investments soared, inequality mushroomed and the elites buzzed about a new gold age. But then, something went wrong; finance, investments and services lost their way. The golden age imploded and the economy became no more than a shell of its old broad-based heyday—Holland in 1770 or Britain in 1945.

This is the enormous risk that ordinary Americans—the huge two-thirds in the economic middle—now take in allowing U.S. democracy and representative government to be undercut and restructured by the U.S. equivalent of the financial and multinational elites that so selfishly misdirected early 20th-century Britain and 18th-century Holland. Recent statistics showing the top 1 percent of Americans soaring on financial wings, even as inflation-adjusted median family incomes are about the same as they were 25 years ago, buttress the parallel. So do efforts of current U.S. elites to move their investments overseas, as the earlier Dutch and British elites did, and to sell technology to nations like China that could easily become a threat to U.S. interests.”

“Ordinary Dutchmen and Britons couldn’t stop the earlier trends, and maybe Americans can’t stop these.”

Excerpts from…
“The Desert Empire: In its desperate search for water, the American West meets the limits of the technological ideal”
by George Sibley
(a former newspaper editor and owner, is a free-lance writer living in Colorado)
Harpers Magazine (October 1977)

“This is a story about a river, but it is also about the desert.”

“Anyone who has spent a few afternoons in the desert has probably seen the clouds billow up and try to rain on it, but the trailing gray sheets and ribbons of rain (often woven with segments of rainbow) are vaporized by the desert’s shield of heat long before they can reach the ground. And when the rain does manage to find its opening and pour in a cloudburst, the earth is baked so hard that even then it fights the downpour; the water doesn’t stay with the ground but goes ripping off, itself frustrated and raging by then, to see what it can find to tear up, break down, and generally raise hell with.

The desert, in short, rejects water; and being myself not much more than an uncountable number of minuscule water vessels, I feel the rebuff: whatever rejects water rejects me, and the feeling is mutual. I resolve the antipathy by generally staying away from deserts.

What this story is about, then, is the temptation that periodically comes over people to take the rebuff as a challenge to go fights the desert—“make it bloom,” as they say. Many of our great ancestral civilizations—Egypt, the so-called Fertile Crescent, Persia, India, central Mexico—evolved in areas with a semi-arid or arid climate. The key technology here has always been the ability to divert and spread the waters of rivers onto lands otherwise too dry for agriculture.

It is a part of our own cultural tradition to think of these ancient civilizations and their great temple-cities as evil and corrupt places—they were, after all, the Egypt from which Moses led the faithful, the Babylon whose towers God cast down, the Sodom and Gomorrah from which the righteous fled, all of them sprung from the alienated seed of that Cain whose “innovative agriculture” the old I Am of the desert refused to accept. If we can accept that it was the destiny of what we call Western civilization with its “Judeo-Christian heritage” to come to America, then we should probably also accept that at least part of the effort we have been gearing up for, in a thousand years of phenomenal technological advance, was our own confrontation with the same age-old nemesis and challenge, in the presence of the Great American Desert west of the Rocky Mountains and its mad river, the Colorado.

After all, like Oliver Wendell Holmes said:

“To understand what is happening today or what will happen in the future, I look back.”

This idea had it in its head that it would be the perfect place to pursue current global issues; economic, political, social, ecological… the timeliness would give the show a sense of immediacy.

It dreamed that even larger philosophical lessons could also be explored.

It could have examined, i.e., how Japan’s economic mess a decade ago parallels our current one and show what worked and what didn’t to solve the problem.
What the hell, this idea wanted to be about the lessons of history, but now…its just relegated to the dust bin of history.
Doomed to regret it.

Homeless Ideas

Until Now!

These ideas have been wandering around without a home for so long they don’t even try to fit in anymore.
They don’t have their hands out, they’ve got their hands up in the air. They give up.

For years they’ve lived on the fringes of opportunity. But everybody has walked right by them, except me. I gave birth to these ideas, so they’re my responsibility.

A lot of them didn’t always have a great start in life. They were jotted down on some cocktail napkin during wild and crazy nights out with friends. Now they’re just unfulfilled promises left for years in drawers and filing cabinets. Deserted, they moldered in maybeville.

These homeless ideas never had a home but, thanks to the Internet, now they’ve got one. My blog is basically an internet flophouse for these homeless ideas. Who knows maybe someday they might even get a job?

At least they’ll find some solace in the company of all of the other homeless ideas out there on the web, after all, misery loves company.

All they’re asking for is a little of your attention, so brother can you spare some time?

Thank you, peace and god bless!

Unprincipled Certainty

The Unprincipled Certainty
A Political Science Theory Postulated by Mason Williams
The Uncertainty Principle:
Heisenberg’s "The Uncertainty Principle" is a scientific theory of quantum mechanics that states:
"The more precisely the position is determined, the less precisely the momentum is known in this instant, and vice versa." --Heisenberg, uncertainty paper, 1927
As I understand it, this translates as; in the process of examining something, you change the nature of the subject you’re scrutinizing. In other words, you alter the nature of something in the act of examining it.

Applying the principle to water, though it seems like water is water, you can’t observe or analyze moving water by stopping it to "understand" it. Moving water has a different ecology than still water. Motion is an integral part of its content, just as standing is an integral part of still water.

As expressed in a scene from the Coen Brothers film, The Man Who Wasn’t There:
LAWYER: (Freddy Riedenschneider)
…This guy in Germany… he’s got this theory.
If you want to test something scientifically, …you gotta look at it, but sometimes when you look at it, your looking changes it. The Uncertainty Principle, sounds screwy, but even Einstein says this guy Heisenberg’s onto something.

The Unprincipled Certainty
My theory, The Unprincipled Certainty, is a political science concept that states:
"The more imprecisely a position is determined, the more precisely you’re going to get away with it." --Williams, unprincipled paper, 2003
It is based on the assumption that by not looking at what politicians are doing, they will not change. This is particularly applicable to the leadership of the Bush Administration.
Simply put, it means that their politically unprincipled position toward science is a certainty.
A good example of this is the war in Iraq. Why we’re really there has never been precisely stated and therefore the future outcome is precisely unknown.

One could apply The Unprincipled Certainty to the deregulation of the financial sector. The more "hands-off" the political position was, the more corrupt the financial market became.

The Unprincipled Certainty relates to politics in a different way than The Uncertainty Principle relates to science. Whereas The Uncertainty Principle is a theory, possibly leading to fact, which has the support of the scientific community, The Unprincipled Certainty is a fact leading to a possible theory, a derivative of political non-support for science in the realm of squat-dumb mechanics.